Tag: Uncategorized

Investigation Discovery’s documentary “Hunted By My Husband: The Untold Story of the DC Sniper” revisits one of America’s most terrifying crime sprees, but this time, the narrative is centered on the woman who was the ultimate target: Dr. Mildred Muhammad, the ex-wife of convicted sniper John Muhammad.

Reframing the Narrative: Domestic Abuse at the Core

In an exclusive interview with BOSSIP, Dr. Muhammad reveals that the infamous 2002 shootings were not random acts of terror, but a calculated plan fueled by domestic abuse. “This opportunity came through Investigation Discovery and No Excuse for Abuse,” she shared. “They found that my story had not really been told, and I was grateful to share the part people needed to know; not many knew about me.”

The documentary, premiering as part of ID’s annual No Excuse for Abuse campaign, aims to shift public understanding of domestic violence, emphasizing that the impact isn’t always visible. “This project allows my story to reach more audiences,” she stated, noting her two decades of work supporting survivors.

The Path to Healing and Advocacy

Dr. Muhammad speaks with remarkable clarity and composure, a testament to years of dedicated healing before stepping into the public spotlight. “I have completely healed from this situation,” she told BOSSIP. “I made sure of that before I began sharing my story. I did a lot of healing before this so I would not be triggered in answering questions or sharing my story with others.”

Her healing journey began with acceptance: acknowledging the pain and working through it, often through journaling when she lacked a support system. This personal work has empowered her to use her platform to educate others about the insidious nature of coercive control and manipulation, particularly in narcissistic relationships.

Understanding Coercive Control and Narcissism

Dr. Muhammad warns that initial encounters often present a curated version of a person. “When you meet someone, you’re meeting their representative,” she explained. “After sixty to ninety days, the true person begins to appear. Pay attention to words. Don’t give people a blueprint to your heart.”

She emphasizes that narcissists are intentional in their actions. “A narcissist knows exactly what they’re doing. Every action is intentional. You have to love yourself more than the person you’re with. That’s the only way to defeat a narcissist.” She also shared how her ex-husband, John Muhammad, joined the Nation of Islam not for spiritual growth, but as a means of control, telling her, “I’m your God, you do what I tell you to do.”

A Blueprint for Leaving and Finding Support

In the documentary and her advocacy, Dr. Muhammad provides practical steps for survivors aiming to leave abusive situations. She acknowledges the risks—up to 75% of women who try to leave are harmed or killed—but urges them not to be deterred. Her advice includes creating a plan, saving money discreetly, keeping essentials packed, and utilizing silence and surprise as tools.

• Create a detailed exit plan.
• Open a separate bank account and save quietly.
• Keep a packed bag at work, not just in your car.
• Maintain silence about your plans; surprise is key.
• Do not post plans on social media or meet the abuser privately.
• Take all identification and important documents.
• Block the abuser on all platforms.

Crucially, she highlights the National Domestic Violence Hotline (1-800-799-7233) as a vital resource, emphasizing that advocates are available 24/7 and survivors are never truly alone. She also challenges the misconception that victims must have visible scars, noting, “Eighty percent of victims don’t have physical scars… For a long time, I didn’t exist.”

Redefining Strength for Survivors

As a Black woman, Dr. Muhammad confronts cultural expectations of stoicism and self-reliance. “We’re–Black women– are often taught to be strong and figure it out on our own,” she agreed. Her story, told with resilience and without bitterness, redefines strength not as the absence of pain, but as the courage to heal, advocate, and find a silver lining each day.

Could we see Kamala Harris back on the presidential campaign trail? In a recent interview, the former Vice President hinted that her political story is far from over, leaving the door open for a potential run in 2028. She also didn’t hold back in her criticism of billionaires she believes are aligning themselves with Donald Trump.

Hinting at a Future Presidential Bid

Speaking with the BBC for their “Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg” program, Harris suggested she might “possibly” be the next president, stating, “I am not done.” She emphasized that public service is deeply ingrained in her, despite facing polling challenges and scrutiny. “If I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office – and I certainly wouldn’t be sitting here.”

When directly asked about a potential 2028 run, Harris stopped short of a definitive confirmation but made her strongest indication yet of her ambitions. Her comments suggest she’s actively considering a comeback, even with long odds.

Criticism of Trump and Corporate America

Harris didn’t shy away from criticizing Donald Trump, whom she labeled a “tyrant” who has “weaponized the Department of Justice” and cannot handle criticism. She referenced an incident where a Trump-appointed regulator threatened ABC, leading to Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, stating, “His skin is so thin he couldn’t endure criticism from a joke, and attempted to shut down an entire media organization in the process.”

Her critique extended to corporate leaders, accusing them of “bending the knee at the foot of a tyrant.” Harris believes these business leaders are capitulating to Trump for personal gain, such as securing mergers or avoiding investigations. She alluded to initiatives like #Project2025 as evidence of this alignment.

White House Responds

Following the interview’s traction, a White House spokesperson issued a sharp response. “When Kamala Harris lost the election in a landslide, she should’ve taken the hint; the American people don’t care about her absurd lies,” the spokesperson stated, dismissing her comments as “grievances to foreign publications.”

Regardless of the White House’s reaction, Harris appears determined to remain a significant voice in the political landscape. “I have lived my entire career as a life of service,” she affirmed, suggesting her commitment to public life is unwavering.

Well, this is a plot twist nobody saw coming! Soulja Boy, known for his energetic hits and sometimes fiery online presence, is now issuing an apology to Kandi Burruss. This unexpected turn comes after a very public and profanity-laced livestream where he went off on the reality TV star and entrepreneur.

The Incident That Sparked the Feud

The whole situation kicked off when a clip from Kandi Burruss’s “Speak On It” podcast went viral. In the episode, Soulja Boy’s former videographer, Charlie Rocket, shared a story from 2007. Rocket alleged that while working for Soulja Boy in Las Vegas, the rapper had spit on leftover chicken fingers that Rocket had asked to eat because he was hungry. The alleged incident occurred after Soulja Boy had ordered $1,000 worth of room service.

After the podcast clip gained traction, Soulja Boy took to livestream to vehemently deny the claims. He unleashed a furious tirade, not only targeting Charlie Rocket but also directing intense anger towards Kandi Burruss for hosting the interview. He insulted her, made threats about “pulling up” to her Atlanta address, and even threatened legal action against her.

Kandi’s Unfazed Response

Kandi Burruss, however, is not one to be easily intimidated. Instead of backing down, she turned Soulja Boy’s threats into an opportunity for engagement. She responded on X (formerly Twitter), inviting him to “pull up” and suggesting they “speak on it.” Her calm and collected response seemed to de-escalate the situation from her end.

Soulja Boy Walks It Back

Ultimately, the threats subsided, and Soulja Boy decided to apologize. In a subsequent livestream, he admitted that his emotions had gotten the better of him. “Man, I’m sending out an apology to Kandi…You know, I overreact sometimes; I see stuff on the internet,” he stated. He expressed his respect for Kandi and asked her to accept his apology.

He clarified that his primary anger was directed at Charlie Rocket for what he considered a false accusation. Soulja Boy also mentioned that friends had advised him to focus his anger on the accuser rather than Kandi. It seems like a lesson learned about channeling frustration appropriately.

The trial for former Sangamon County Sheriff’s deputy Sean Grayson is underway, and the proceedings are revealing some deeply troubling details. Grayson is accused of fatally shooting his ex-partner, Sonya Massey, inside her home, and the testimony presented is painting a grim picture of the events that transpired.

Damaging Testimony from Ex-Partner

Grayson’s former partner, Dawson Farley, took the stand and delivered testimony that directly contradicts the defense’s narrative. Farley stated that he never felt threatened by Massey’s behavior during their interaction with the two officers. “She never did anything that made me think she was a threat,” Farley testified, according to ABCNews.

Farley went on to explicitly state that it was Grayson’s actions that raised his own sense of awareness, making it clear where his loyalties lie. His desire to “do right” by Massey by testifying against Grayson speaks volumes about the gravity of the situation.

Pathologist: Victim Could Have Survived

Adding further weight to the prosecution’s case, Dr. Nathaniel Patterson, a forensic pathologist from the Sangamon County Coroner’s office, testified that Sonya Massey could have potentially survived the shooting if she had received medical aid. This testimony directly challenges Grayson’s actions following the incident.

Body camera footage reportedly shows Grayson telling Farley not to render aid, believing Massey was already dead due to the severity of her injury. This alleged decision not to provide medical assistance, coupled with the pathologist’s statement, is a critical point in the trial.

Expert Witness Questions Behavior

The prosecution also called upon retired LaGrange, Georgia police officer Louis Dekmar as an expert witness. Dekmar reviewed the video evidence and testified that he did not observe Massey exhibiting any threatening behavior towards the officers, further undermining the defense’s claims.

With testimony from an ex-partner, a medical expert, and a seasoned law enforcement professional all pointing towards Grayson’s culpability, the path to justice for Sonya Massey’s family appears to be gaining momentum. The jury’s decision will be crucial in holding Grayson accountable for his alleged actions.