Just days after NFL star Stefon Diggs was found not guilty of felony strangulation and assault, his former private chef, Jamila “Mila” Adams, has leaked text messages that she claims paint a different picture of their relationship. While a Massachusetts jury deliberated for less than two hours to clear Diggs, Mila is now bringing her side of the story to the public, and the texts suggest a deeply “toxic” dynamic.
The Pay Dispute and Heated Exchanges
The leaked messages reportedly stem from a pay dispute, with Mila claiming she was owed thousands in back pay. One particularly explosive exchange allegedly shows Diggs texting, “I won’t be paying you s—.” Mila’s camp argues this text proves he was attempting to use his financial power to intimidate her before the alleged physical altercation occurred.
A Messy Overlap: Lover, Landlord, Boss
Prosecutors had described Diggs’ relationship with Mila as a complex mix of “sometimes lover, landlord, and boss.” The leaked texts seem to support this, revealing a messy overlap of these roles. Before the alleged assault, Mila reportedly texted Diggs, “I’m out of your life,” following a disagreement over a planned trip to Miami.
The Defense’s Counterarguments
Diggs’ defense team, however, used these same texts to argue that Mila was a “scorned woman” seeking to “leverage and humiliate” him after their romantic entanglement soured. They also highlighted key points that swayed the jury.
- **Birthday Note:** Witnesses testified that Mila was seen looking for a pen to write Diggs a sentimental birthday card just hours after the alleged incident.
- **Deleted Texts:** A forensics expert revealed that Mila had deleted several messages from her phone before handing it over to the police.
- **Hairstylist’s Testimony:** Diggs’ hairstylist testified that she saw Mila days later and noted her neck appeared “flawless” with no visible marks or redness.
The Court of Public Opinion
Despite the jury’s “Not Guilty” verdict, the leaked texts have reignited the debate. Mila’s camp points to the messages as evidence of emotional and financial abuse, even if visible injuries weren’t apparent. Meanwhile, Diggs’ legal team successfully cast doubt on Mila’s narrative.
The situation remains contentious, with the court of public opinion still divided. Was this a case of a “toxic” boss, or a “scorned woman” seeking a substantial payout? The leaked texts certainly add fuel to the ongoing discussion.
What do you make of the leaked texts from Stefon Diggs’ former chef? Do they change your perspective on the case? Share your thoughts in the comments below!