Recent events have brought a past dispute between rappers Offset and Lil Tjay back into the spotlight. Following Offset’s shooting outside a Florida casino and Lil Tjay’s subsequent arrest on unrelated charges, new details have emerged about their alleged financial disagreements.
The $10K Debt and a Cryptic Response
Last year, Lil Tjay publicly accused Offset of owing him $10,000 and allegedly refusing to pay it back, even suggesting the former Migos member had a gambling addiction. This led to a heated exchange on social media. Now, according to DJ Akademiks, who claims to have an upcoming interview with Lil Tjay, the situation escalated with a cryptic response from Offset.
Akademiks revealed that when Lil Tjay asked Offset for his money back, Offset allegedly responded via direct message with the phrase, ‘N***a, get it back in blood.’ This alleged remark has added a layer of intrigue to their past conflict, especially in light of Offset’s recent shooting.
Lil Tjay’s Attorney Denies Involvement
It’s important to note that while Lil Tjay was arrested on charges of disorderly conduct and driving without a valid license, his attorney, Dawn M. Florio, has vehemently denied any involvement in the shooting that injured Offset. Florio released a statement clarifying that Lil Tjay was not shot and has not been charged in connection with the incident, urging the public to rely on verified news sources.
Offset is reportedly in stable condition following the shooting, which authorities state occurred after a fight. The exact circumstances surrounding the altercation remain unclear. The resurfacing of the alleged debt dispute, coupled with these recent events, has fueled speculation among fans and media outlets.
Context of the Dispute
The tension between the two artists first surfaced publicly early last year. Lil Tjay’s accusations pointed towards a significant sum owed and a potential gambling problem on Offset’s part, leading to public back-and-forth. DJ Akademiks’ recent comments suggest that Offset’s response to repaying the debt was dismissive and potentially ominous, adding another dimension to their history.
What are your thoughts on the alleged ‘get it back in blood’ comment? Do you think this past dispute is connected to recent events? Share your views in the comments below!