Judge Rules Milagro Gramz Not a Journalist

The defamation case filed by Megan Thee Stallion against blogger Milagro Gramz is heating up, and a recent court ruling has dealt a significant blow to Gramz. In a move that could impact her defense, a judge has determined that Milagro Gramz is not a legitimate journalist, effectively stripping her of the protections typically afforded to reporters.

Her Own Words Seal the Deal

According to reports from The Neighborhood Talk, Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team filed new documents arguing that Gramz lacks any journalistic merit. The core of their argument is that Gramz should not be able to hide behind journalistic ethics because she doesn’t operate as a true journalist. The presiding judge agreed, using Gramz’s own past statements as evidence.

The court resurfaced quotes from Gramz’s own livestreams, where she explicitly stated things like, ‘I did not tell anybody I was a reporter… I ain’t never told you I went to school for journalism… You don’t need to be a journalist to give an opinion.’ These candid admissions proved crucial in the judge’s decision.

Lack of Journalistic Integrity

Adding to her legal troubles, Gramz also reportedly admitted to having no knowledge of journalistic ethics or the standard processes involved in reporting. This further solidified the court’s stance that her content is not that of a professional journalist.

Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team argues that this ruling clearly demonstrates Gramz was merely spreading opinions, potentially influenced by Tory Lanez and his father, Sonstar Peterson. The goal of this motion is to officially label Gramz as an inauthentic reporter, preventing her from using journalistic privilege as a shield.

The Trial Looms

This defamation case stems from statements made by Gramz concerning the 2020 shooting incident involving Tory Lanez. Megan Thee Stallion filed the lawsuit over a year ago, accusing Gramz of ‘churning out falsehoods’ and attacking her character with false narratives. She stated last year, ‘It’s unacceptable behavior and these individuals need to understand there will be repercussions for recklessly posting lies and defamatory falsehoods.’

The trial for this high-profile defamation case is scheduled to begin on Monday, November 17, 2025. The outcome could set a significant precedent for how social media content creators are treated in legal proceedings, especially when they claim journalistic privilege.