Chef Shares Texts in Stefon Diggs Case

So, Stefon Diggs just got a not guilty verdict in his assault case, but the drama isn’t quite over. His former chef, Mila Belle, is now sharing alleged text messages, claiming Diggs offered her a hefty sum to drop her claims. She’s calling these messages her ‘receipts’ to fight back against what she calls the ‘scorned woman’ narrative.

The Chef’s Side of the Story

Chef Mila Belle isn’t backing down. Despite the jury’s decision, she’s taken to social media to present her version of events. She shared screenshots of alleged text conversations that she claims were submitted as evidence but not fully explored during the trial.

According to Adams, these messages reveal Diggs expressing love, referencing their past relationship, and, most notably, allegedly offering $100,000 through a representative. This offer, she states, was contingent on her recanting her claims under a non-disclosure agreement, an offer she says she refused.

Disputing the ‘Scorned Woman’ Narrative

Adams is adamant about setting the record straight. She posted captions like, ‘I know what I experienced. He knows what happened. And the people who know him know the truth as well.’ She feels these messages, which she claims show Diggs’ attempts to silence her, need to be heard.

She specifically called out Xia Charles, who testified for Diggs during the trial. Adams alleges that Charles was aware of the physical assault and acted as a go-between for the alleged $100,000 offer. Adams expressed regret for meeting with Charles, stating she wanted understanding but instead received the proposed deal.

Xia Charles’ Response

Xia Charles, however, has publicly refuted Adams’ claims. She shared a video of herself styling Cardi B’s hair, seemingly dismissing the drama with a caption that suggested people were being too slow to catch on to the situation.

This situation highlights the complex interplay between legal outcomes and public perception. While Diggs secured a legal victory, Chef Mila Belle is determined to share her narrative, using alleged text messages as her evidence. It’s a stark reminder that legal battles can spill over into the court of public opinion.