Rihanna Shooting Suspect Loses Custody

In a significant development stemming from the incident outside Rihanna’s Los Angeles home, Ivanna Lisette Ortiz, who is currently jailed in connection with the alleged shooting, has lost contact with her child. A Florida judge has issued a ruling that severely impacts her parental rights while the criminal case proceeds.

No Contact with Child Ordered

According to recent court records, a Florida judge has ruled that Ortiz is prohibited from having any communication with her child until further notice. The only potential exception would be if the child’s father were to personally grant permission. This drastic measure underscores the seriousness of the allegations against her.

Furthermore, the judge has awarded full custody of the child to the father, granting him complete control over all day-to-day decisions. This ruling comes as Ortiz faces an attempted murder charge in California related to the March incident at Rihanna’s property.

The Alleged Shooting Incident

Authorities allege that Ortiz drove to Rihanna’s residence in March and fired multiple shots outside the home. Law enforcement sources indicated that Rihanna was inside the home with her three children at the time of the incident. Ortiz, identified as a 35-year-old woman with a history of targeting Rihanna on social media, has pleaded not guilty to the attempted murder charge and remains incarcerated without bond.

Custody Case Delayed

The Florida court has also put a hold on an ongoing custody case between Ortiz and the child’s father. The order specifies that no trial date will be set until Ortiz’s criminal case in California reaches a resolution. The judge also took into account Ortiz’s previous involuntary psychiatric hold in Florida, which she claims was based on false allegations.

For the time being, the child’s father will maintain sole custody while Ortiz remains in custody, awaiting the legal proceedings in California. This situation highlights the complex intersection of criminal charges, parental rights, and public safety.

What are your thoughts on this court ruling regarding custody? Share your opinions in the comments below!

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *