Michigan Woman Accused of Food Stamp Fraud for Online Bakery

A Michigan woman is facing a potential decade behind bars and a hefty fine for allegedly using her state-issued food assistance to fund an online bakery business. Talia Teneyuque, 32, is accused of purchasing baking supplies with her Bridge Card, Michigan’s supplemental food program, to create goods she later sold online.

The Allegations: Misusing Food Assistance

Prosecutors allege that between January 2022 and September 2023, Teneyuque used her Bridge Card to buy ingredients for baked goods sold on Facebook. The investigation, conducted by the Michigan Office of Inspector General, suggests that over $20,000 in funds were misused, resulting in more than $1,000 in profits for her business.

The case moved to circuit court after Teneyuque rejected a plea deal during a preliminary hearing on October 9th. This deal would have potentially kept a conviction off her record. She was arrested on August 4th after a warrant was issued in June and was subsequently charged with one count of food stamp fraud. She was released on a $50,000 bond the same day.

Teneyuque’s Defense: A Mother’s Love

In response to the charges, a GoFundMe campaign has been launched under Teneyuque’s name. She describes herself as a stay-at-home mother of five, explaining that baking is her way of expressing love and creating joyful moments for her children. She emphasizes the care and creativity she puts into her desserts, viewing them as a primary way to show affection.

In a note on the fundraising page, Teneyuque stated, “I’ve never lied or misused these benefits. I follow the rules and remain deeply grateful for the support that helps me care for my family.” She expressed her dismay at being targeted, especially when her sole intention is to be the best mother she can be.

Potential Consequences

If convicted of food stamp fraud, Teneyuque could face up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The GoFundMe aims to raise $18,000, and has so far garnered nearly $2,000 in donations. This case raises important questions about the intersection of social assistance programs, small business ventures, and the legal system.