Barnard College Accused of Firing Pregnant Custodian

Barnard College, an institution renowned for its commitment to women’s empowerment, is facing serious accusations of discriminatory practices. Shakira Zahiruddin, an eight-months-pregnant custodian, alleges that the all-women’s college fired her via email on August 26th specifically to avoid compensating her during maternity leave, violating seniority protocols and women’s rights.

Allegations of Unjust Termination and Seniority Violation

Zahiruddin, a mother of two with a newborn on the way, expressed her profound disappointment and worry during a press conference at the TWU Local 264 Union office in Brooklyn. “You wouldn’t really expect that due to what they stand for,” she said, questioning how an institution that champions women could act in such a manner. “I feel left alone, and I am extremely worried for my kids moving forward. How could an all-women’s college just not care?” she added, labeling the college’s actions as “unjust and inhumane.”

The union asserts that under their collective bargaining agreement, layoffs must strictly adhere to seniority. However, Zahiruddin, who has been with the college for a significant period, was let go while a male custodian hired nearly four months after her was retained. This discrepancy has led Zahiruddin and the union to believe the decision was neither fair nor legitimate, declaring the action “a deliberate attempt to erase a senior worker’s rights.”

Union Demands Reinstatement and Back Pay

Joseph Rose, President of TWU Local 264, strongly condemned Barnard College’s actions, stating, “They are just looking at the monetary aspect.” The union is demanding Zahiruddin’s immediate reinstatement, full benefits, back pay, and a guarantee of her maternity leave. The timing of the layoff is particularly devastating for Zahiruddin, as her salary and health benefits expired just six days before her expected due date, leaving her without income or coverage to support her growing family.

Barnard College, however, maintains that the layoff was not related to Zahiruddin’s health condition. A spokesperson stated that the changes were driven by college-wide restructuring affecting 77 full-time positions, citing operational needs and compliance with union procedures. While the school confirmed that affected union members were offered opportunities to reapply for open positions, they did not explain how Zahiruddin’s seniority was overlooked in this process.

What are your thoughts on Barnard College’s alleged actions? Do you believe the union’s claims? Share your opinions in the comments below!

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *