Following the state attorney’s decision not to pursue further action against the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office deputy involved in the violent arrest of William McNeil Jr., prominent civil rights attorneys Harry Daniels and Ben Crump are taking the case to the federal level. They have formally requested the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to launch an investigation into the incident.
Calls for Federal Intervention
The incident, which occurred on February 19, involved Officer Donald Bowers repeatedly punching the 22-year-old Black college student after breaking his car window and dragging him out of his vehicle. The violent encounter was captured on viral video, sparking national outrage. Despite this, the state attorney’s office concluded its review without taking further action against the deputy.
Attorneys Crump and Daniels have submitted a request to the Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division, urging the DOJ to investigate whether McNeil’s civil rights were violated under 18 U.S. Code § 242. This federal statute prohibits the deprivation of rights under color of law.
Critique of the State Attorney’s Report
In a press release, Crump’s office detailed the extent of McNeil’s injuries, including lacerations, a fractured tooth, and a diagnosed traumatic brain injury, allegedly sustained from multiple blows to the face and body, and forceful slamming of his head on the pavement. The attorneys criticized the State Attorney’s report for attempting to rationalize Officer Bowers’ actions and for overlooking key details.
Specifically, the lawyers pointed out that Officer Bowers failed to report his initial strike to McNeil’s face and claimed McNeil was attempting to flee, a narrative contradicted by the video evidence. Furthermore, they highlighted the State Attorney’s Office’s decision not to interview McNeil, which they argue is a fundamental prosecutorial oversight.
Contradictions and Questionable Justifications
The initial justification for the stop—driving without a seatbelt and headlights—also faces scrutiny. Video footage shows it was daytime, and there were no apparent signs of inclement weather. Regarding the seatbelt claim, Crump and Daniels noted that the video shows McNeil was wearing his seatbelt. The report also mentions McNeil reaching towards his floorboard before officers broke his window, where an unsheathed knife was later found, though no video footage supports this claim.
It’s not just how violent and brutal these officers were. It’s that they were absolutely unapologetic because they knew no one was going to hold them accountable. — Harry Daniels
Daniels stated, “It’s clear that the State Attorney’s Office refuses to do anything about it. So we’re calling on the Department of Justice.” Crump echoed this sentiment, calling the State Attorney’s Office’s failure to hold officers accountable “as appalling as the beating itself.”
Skepticism Regarding DOJ Response
However, the article expresses skepticism about the likelihood of a thorough DOJ investigation under the current administration, suggesting that civil rights cases must align with the political agenda. The piece references the DOJ’s recent decisions to end police-accountability agreements with Minneapolis and Louisville, which stemmed from investigations following the deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd.
What are your thoughts on the request for a DOJ investigation into William McNeil Jr.’s arrest? Share your opinions in the comments below.