Talk Dat Talk | Your Black Celebrity Gossip, Culture News & Trending Tea

Tag: Jail Time

  • Taxstone Gets 37 Months for Smuggling Contraband

    It’s been a complex legal journey for podcaster Daryl Campbell, widely known as Taxstone. Already serving a significant 35-year sentence for manslaughter stemming from a 2016 incident, his time behind bars has just gotten longer. A recent development in Brooklyn federal court has added a new layer to his incarceration.

    New Sentence for Contraband Smuggling

    On May 29, 2026, Taxstone was handed a 37-month prison sentence for his role in a contraband smuggling scheme. This operation reportedly took place at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn, where he has been held. The charges involved attempting to bring a variety of illicit items into the facility.

    According to reports, the contraband included a rope laced with synthetic cannabinoid, over 100 strips of synthetic opioid, approximately 27 bags of marijuana, more than 400 cigarettes, two lighters, a scalpel, and a cellphone-charging cord with its plug. Taxstone pleaded guilty last September to one count of conspiracy to provide and possess contraband within a prison facility.

    The Legal Maze: Multiple Sentences

    This new 37-month sentence is particularly noteworthy because it will begin *after* his existing 35-year manslaughter sentence concludes. This stems from the 2016 shooting of an associate of rapper Troy Ave during a backstage altercation at a T.I. concert in New York City. Taxstone is reportedly appealing this initial manslaughter conviction.

    Adding another layer, he also has a 115-month sentence for federal gun charges related to the same 2016 incident. However, this sentence is set to run concurrently with his manslaughter sentence, meaning it won’t extend his overall time served beyond the 35 years. During the recent sentencing hearing, Taxstone reportedly expressed frustration with the federal legal process and his inability to fight his case more effectively.

    The podcaster admitted to organizing the smuggling scheme, but claimed he shouldn’t even be in prison in the first place. — Complex

    The legal saga surrounding Taxstone continues to unfold, with his manslaughter conviction appeal also pending. This latest sentence for contraband smuggling adds significant time to his already lengthy incarceration, highlighting the serious consequences of attempting to bypass prison regulations.

    What are your thoughts on Taxstone’s ongoing legal battles? Share your perspective in the comments below!

  • NJ Parents Face Fines for Teen Disturbances

    Parents in Gloucester Township, New Jersey, are now facing potential consequences if their children are repeatedly involved in public disturbances. The township has adopted a new ordinance aimed at holding guardians accountable for their minors’ disruptive behavior in the community. This measure comes after a chaotic Gloucester Township Day last year, which saw fights involving hundreds of teens, leading to the event’s cancellation this year.

    Holding Parents Accountable

    The ordinance targets parents or guardians whose children are repeatedly convicted of certain offenses. According to police, the measure covers 28 specific offenses. If a minor is repeatedly found guilty, parents could face up to 90 days in jail or a fine of up to $2,000.

    Local reactions are mixed. Some residents, like Mo H. of Lindenwold, support the ordinance, stating, “Yes, the parents should have some repercussions for how their children are performing in the community.” They believe parental guidance is key to preventing such issues.

    Concerns About Financial Hardship

    However, opponents like Ozzie Smith-Bey of Clementon express concerns about the potential financial strain the law could place on families. He suggests that cases should continue to be handled through the existing court system. Lt. Paul Fisher of the Chino Police Department emphasized that each case will be reviewed individually to ensure fairness.

    This ordinance reflects a growing trend of municipalities seeking new ways to address juvenile delinquency and public order issues, placing a greater emphasis on parental responsibility. The effectiveness and fairness of such measures will likely be closely watched.

    What are your thoughts on this new ordinance? Should parents be held legally responsible for their children’s repeated public disturbances? Share your opinions in the comments below!