It appears Larry Jackson’s entertainment company, gamma, is fighting back against what it calls a coordinated online smear campaign. The company has filed a lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court, aiming to unmask the anonymous individuals behind two websites making serious allegations of financial misconduct and streaming manipulation.
Accusations and Denials
The websites in question, “larryjacksonexposed.com” and “gammaexposed.com,” reportedly surfaced shortly after a positive feature on Jackson’s rise in the music industry. Gamma argues that the allegations are entirely fabricated and designed to tarnish the company’s reputation. These claims include accusations that sales for Kanye West’s album ‘Vultures’ were artificially boosted using bots.
The lawsuit documents detail inflammatory language used on the sites, including claims that Jackson has significantly depleted his raised funds and that gamma is “embezzling investor funds for private flights, grandiose lifestyle, personal PR and legacy artist signings to enhance image and status.” These accusations paint a picture of financial impropriety and misuse of investor capital.
Targeting Artists and Spreading Disinformation
The alleged smear campaign didn’t stop at gamma and Jackson. The websites also targeted artists associated with the company, such as Mariah Carey and Usher. False claims suggested that gamma was “laundering” money for Carey and that major talent was quietly departing due to manipulated streaming figures.
Gamma vehemently denies all these accusations. The company believes there was a deliberate social media operation to spread these false claims. They allege that numerous newly created X (formerly Twitter) accounts amplified links to the websites rapidly, and similar messages appeared on Reddit before certain accounts were banned. Investigators have reportedly struggled to identify the culprits due to hidden hosting information and anonymous web infrastructure.
Seeking Justice
In response to this alleged defamation, gamma is not only seeking damages but also the complete removal of the websites. They are pushing for a jury trial to clear their name and hold those responsible accountable for the damage caused to their business and reputation.
What are your thoughts on this legal battle? Do you think these websites are a smear campaign or do they hold any truth? Share your opinions in the comments below!